The debate needs to move well BEYOND "Drill in Alaska!" "Start Building Nuclear!" or "Invest in Solar!"

As Americans who assert complete democratic control over our government, instituted "for the people, by the people," we represent America's future leaders in support of truly conducive energy technologies that are beneficial for humankind.

In 2008, it is ridiculous to still be burning dinosaur meat. If skeptical, I urge people to think as critically as they can about how our leaders lie to us about one thing after another. We always hear false hope with health, energy, taxes, etc.
For most, energy independence is a campaign slogan, but not a reality.

By asserting energy independence we can reduce air and water pollution, eliminate costs on the free movement of individuals, and the lives of those lost on the battlefield in wars fought for oil..

There are automobile engine motors that run on water, electromagnetism, vegetable oil, and operate at several times the energy efficiency as the current proposed "hybrids".

One of the greatest inventors of all time, Serbian immigrant to the United States Nikola Tesla, developed a world system for "the transmission of electrical energy without wires" that depends upon electrical conductivity as early as 1891. JP Morgan bought the patent to prevent this technology from threatening their oil interests. By being dependent on fossil fuels for our survival, the powers that be exert control over the American population. Freeing ourselves of this dependency will create great things for humankind.

6 Minute Video covering the suppression of energy solutions and threats and
murder of inventors:

In 1994, Troy Reed re-invented a version of the electromagentic engine motor. He refused to sell out to the oil companies, and local news even covered his story, giving their viewers hope that we could be free from the oil standard in a few short years. His device never went to market, we do not know where it is, and he died in suspicious circumstances.

Article 1 Section 8 of the United State Constitution says: "The Congress shall have power .... To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries."

Today, we are also seeing the exclusion of cold fusion technology. Cold fusion has, for the time being, been stopped for proceeding normally in the United States of America by a systematic conspiracy by some in the Department of Energy and the US Patent Office, but it has proceeded worldwide, with superb experimental work continuing in Japan, Russia, China, France, Italy, and India.

Scientists, "experts", the media, and other professionals are hired to "debunk" this technology for obvious reasons. Read between the lines - they are trying to pull the wool over your eyes!!!

Unlike hot fusion, cold fusion does not make everything radioactive by neutron irradiation. And cold fusion yielded the first fusion reactors in the world to use fusion fuel (in 1989). Also, unlike hot fusion, cold fusion has NO radioactive waste and has already achieved breakeven. (Cold Fusion Times)

Typical nuclear plants produce radioactive waste which is already so extraneous that our government lets companies recycle nuclear waste into consumer products like street lights, furniture, and toys, as well as weaponry used in military weapons. Generations of civilians in Iraq and elsewhere are being exposed to this radioactivity, as well as our troops. From the first Gulf War (1990-1) our troops have developed a group of sickness related to this termed "Gulf War Syndrome." The time table for building a typical nuclear energy plant is at least 10 years to build and commission.

In 2005, Sony Pictures put out a film entitled "Who Killed the Electric Car?" exposing a plan by General Motors to squash energy efficient cars.

The plan to keep us using oil goes back a long time. Auto manufacturers designed the suburbs of America in such a manner as to be non-conducive to public transportation, and collaborated with our federal government to create the highway, bridge, and tunnel system to create their market for the individual automobile.

Although we are seeing a rise in "Renewable" Energy production like Wind and Solar, projections show that fossil fuel power is increasing at higher levels than renewables. This will mean that the present solutions from the "Green" crowd are inadequate and will keep the world on track for using more fossil fuels that each year prior for another 50 or 100 years, with no end in sight.

From his chart, it's simple to see why mainstream environmental organizations and political candidates are allowed to freely spew and debate their substandard solutions while our guys who invent real solutions to take us off fossil fuels within five years wind up being derailed or dying in suspicious circumstances.

So the debate needs to move beyond how much money to "invest" in solar and wind energy, or whether or not to drill for a few months of oil in Alaska. Why do the popular candidates and elected officials keep such a restricted debate? We can not prove all who are "in on" the scam or not, but we can prove that many politicians receive money from fossil fuel interests companies for the high costs of running election campaigns.

We live in a free market economy, and we assert the rights for inventors to market devices without being physically bullied into either selling out or winding up dead in a gutter. The government has failed to properly institute law enforcement to protect entrepreneurs. We assert the right under constitutional law to protect the lives of these people by any legal and Constitutionally protected means necessary. This includes the use of a licensed, trained, and armed civilian defense unit. This will ensure "nothing fishy" happens which would prevent the world being freed from fossil fuels with beneficial technologies.

We will not compromise with the oil companies who have profited off of killing our people and the planet. Putting up a wind turbine or two a year is not going to cut it. Too many people are dying in wars for oil for us to settle for anything mediocre. Two million Iraqi civilians in the 2003-Present Iraq War and unfortunately more to come.

Enough is enough.

Public forums and debates welcome.

Above is a car that runs on water 100% (Japan), don't get too excited about it's availability for you anytime soon. For over 100 years these technologies have been derailed. Unless, we use a different approach.